PimEyes matches faces. Google matches file bytes. Neither one indexes Tinder or Bumble. A head-to-head comparison of coverage, accuracy, cost and privacy — plus what to use when both come up empty.

For finding other pictures of a specific person on the public web, yes. PimEyes matches faces; Google matches image files. For finding where a specific image file has been used online, Google is better and free. Neither one indexes dating apps like Tinder, Bumble or Hinge.
No. Tinder, Bumble, Hinge and every other major dating app block external crawlers in their robots.txt and serve profile photos from private CDNs with rotating URLs. PimEyes has no way to index them. Only a tool that queries the dating apps directly, such as PartnerCheck, can search inside them.
PimEyes runs a face detection model over every image on the pages it has crawled, encodes each detected face as a numeric vector called a face embedding, then stores those vectors in a search index. When you upload a photo it encodes the face the same way and finds vectors that are mathematically close. This is why PimEyes matches different photos of the same person taken years apart, while Google reverse image search usually cannot.
PimEyes Open Plus is $29.99 per month for up to 25 searches per day with unblurred match URLs. PROtect, which continuously monitors for new appearances of a face and assists with takedowns, is $89.99 per month. A free tier exists but blurs the actual match URLs so you can see there are matches without knowing where they are.
Yes and it is unlimited. There is no signed-in requirement and no per-search cost. The tradeoff is that Google matches file bytes rather than faces, so any edit to the image (crop, filter, recompression) can break the match. Most dating profile photos have been edited or recompressed at least once, which is why Google usually fails on them.
A dating-app-specific search. PartnerCheck runs one photo against 50+ apps including Tinder, Bumble, Hinge, Feeld and Ashley Madison in under 60 seconds for $19.99. Neither Google nor PimEyes can see inside those apps. PimEyes might surface a public Instagram or LinkedIn from the same face, which is useful adjacent context but not proof of an active dating profile.
Yes, within limits. Face embeddings tolerate ageing better than file matching does. NIST Face Recognition Vendor Test results show top face models stay above 90% accuracy on photos up to about five years old under normal conditions. Beyond ten years, accuracy drops noticeably. Google reverse image search would fail on the same photo unless the exact file were reposted somewhere else on the public web.
Submit an opt-out request on the PimEyes website with a photo of yourself and a government ID. Removal takes two to four weeks typically. It removes your current face embeddings but does not prevent re-indexing later unless you subscribe to their PROtect plan, which monitors and repeats removals automatically.
In the United States, yes. Both tools search publicly accessible content. PimEyes indexes the open web; PartnerCheck queries public dating profiles. You are not accessing anyone's account and you are not intercepting communications. Private use to inform your own decisions is legal. Publishing the results, contacting the person's employer, or using them to harm someone can create separate legal issues.